| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ian Pritchard (chopper) IFPA Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 718 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So that would mean that Pixie Mirage and Pixie ss Mirage are the same and that only one record can exist? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamieson Hickingbotham (james_dean) IFPA Member
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 360 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure they're not unique, Guido. The wording is something along the lines of: "Setting surface does not mean unique unless it causes a change in adds". And Ian of course they are different, I don't even understand how you got to that idea... just because tricks aren't unique in shred30 doesn't mean they're not different in real life, apart from the fact that those are unique in shred30 anyway.... is there something I'm missing?
How did we get to ss mirage vs mirage anyway? I thought it was pixie vs mirage? I always assumed the pixie record as being ss mirage, who does pixie op toe?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Pritchard (chopper) IFPA Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 718 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well Guido was arguing that ss mirage and mirage are the same thing, so by adding Pixie to the front of both tricks nothing really changes between them, they are still the same by that logic.
And the discussion was pixie vs ss mirage; one is uptime, one is downtime is how i saw the difference, but if youre all going to cry about it, then forget i even posted it. It was a joke record anyway, 30 is nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamieson Hickingbotham (james_dean) IFPA Member
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 360 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
oh OK, I think I get it now. I was a bit confused on how the discussion was going...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy OWheel (owheelj) IFPA Member
Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 1508 Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
wtf are you people talking about?
ss mirage and mirage are different moves.
Pixie and ss mirage are the same move.
Symp mirage and symp pixie are different moves
pixie ss mirage and pixie mirage (smear) are different moves.
What some people call downtime ss mirage was originally called "pixie" uptime pixies were invented well after downtime ss mirage was named pixie. It certainly makes more sense for "pixie" to only refer to the set but unfortantly a lot of parts of footbag move naming doesn't make sense and it's very hard to change the names of moves because they don't make sense or because there is a better way of naming them. When I refer to pixie I am always either referring to it as a set or as a lone move - ie any set to downtime mirage move I will call a mirage even if it technically could be called a pixie but if it's just a downtime ss mirage or symp mirage I'll call it a pixie because that's it's move name. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scott Kirchner (bendan) IFPA Member
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 63 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Back to the records.
Dan hit 31 drifters last night. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Pritchard (chopper) IFPA Member
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 718 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
greedy bugger! why does he have to take all the records?! nyaaarggh
now i have no chance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brendan Erskine (BrendanE) IFPA Member
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 21 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Even though i've not kicked for a couple of years now, I still remember the times i've hit 3 consec spinning ducking butterflys, and 3 consec spinning ducking osis. You can add them if you so desire. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jesse Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
DAMN BRENDAN
3 consec spinning ducking osis is mad as.
i did 13 zooming ss clippers
is that a rec? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex Urano (uranos)
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 208 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wtf r u talking about? zooming implies spinning out of an osis doesnt it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brendan Erskine (BrendanE) IFPA Member
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 21 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah F*&K, yes 3xspinning ducking osis is mad, and I have not hit that. Sorry, sorry, sorry. just 3 x ducking osis, which is relatively easy.
I'm sure you've hit more than that anyway, Jesse.
I should keep my mouth shut. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamieson Hickingbotham (james_dean) IFPA Member
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 360 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
lol
I think it's obvious Jesse means osis > gyro clipper rpt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy OWheel (owheelj) IFPA Member
Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 1508 Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lol you n00b Jesse. I see two options as to what he means - either he means 13 gyro clippers or he means 13 gyro osis. Zooming is not a set name - it's just a waste of time. Osis>spin - that is easy to understand. Zooming clipper would presumably be osis>spinning clipper since I would presume far side out of a set name unless otherwise specified. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jesse Malouf (*Jethro*)
Joined: 06 Dec 2003 Posts: 59 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jamieson Hickingbotham (james_dean) wrote: |
I think it's obvious Jesse means osis > gyro clipper rpt |
cheers jamieson.
yes thats what i meant.
and Jeremy, if i meant 13 gyro clippers I would of said so. Don't be a dickhead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeremy OWheel (owheelj) IFPA Member
Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 1508 Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The consecutive records are for consecutively hitting a particular move - not consecutively hitting 2 moves. I think that's good because there are already a huge amount of records - imagine how many more there would be if you could set records for 2 move combos. Or actually in this case technically 4 moves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|